Indian Journal of Research in Homeopathy

: 2021  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 165--171

Evaluation of haematological parameters and oxidative stress-induced in rats exposed to radio-frequency radiation from mobile phones

Priscilla Ngozi Ezemelue1, D Ugochukwu Onyegbule2, Leona Chika Okoli3, Kafilat Olaide Kareem4, Olufunsho Awodele5, Adebayo Akeem Otitoloju1,  
1 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Technology, Fed. Polytechnic, Auchi, Edo, Nigeria
3 Center for Human Virology, Genomics and Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
4 Department of Biochemistry, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
5 Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Priscilla Ngozi Ezemelue
Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, 6 Edmund Crescent Yaba, Lagos


Introduction: The use of new wireless technologies emitting radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) radiation has been introduced worldwide, raising concerns about their biosafety. So far, there have been contradictory scientific reports which have led to active debates over the bio-effects of EMF on the ecosystem. Aim: This study, therefore, aims to evaluate the bio-effect of exposure to RF-EMF from a mobile phone simulator. Materials and Methods: The experimental study used 16 healthy albino rats (8 females/8 males) randomly selected and divided equally into two groups: Group A (8 rats exposed to mobile phone simulators) and Group C (8 rats as control); the study procedure was carried out for 6 weeks. The rats were examined for physical changes, hematological profiles, and serum oxidative stress (OS) biomarkers. Results: The outcome of the study showed that exposure to RF-EMF affected the weight of the animals; this is illustrated when comparing the baseline weight/final weight of the exposed as compared to the control. This trend was also replicated when compared across gender, though further analysis showed no significance across the two groups (P > 0.05). The result of the hematological analysis showed that only granulocytes (neutrophils, basophils, and eosinophils) showed significance (P = 0.04), while for OS biomarkers, the result showed that superoxide dismutase and catalase showed significant difference (P = 0.02), respectively, across the two groups. Conclusion: This study concludes that exposure to RF-EMF has an associated effect on hematology and OS induction and therefore recommends the adherence to the precautionary principle while further research has been carried out on their specific mechanism and site of action.

How to cite this article:
Ezemelue PN, Onyegbule D U, Okoli LC, Kareem KO, Awodele O, Otitoloju AA. Evaluation of haematological parameters and oxidative stress-induced in rats exposed to radio-frequency radiation from mobile phones.Niger J Exp Clin Biosci 2021;9:165-171

How to cite this URL:
Ezemelue PN, Onyegbule D U, Okoli LC, Kareem KO, Awodele O, Otitoloju AA. Evaluation of haematological parameters and oxidative stress-induced in rats exposed to radio-frequency radiation from mobile phones. Niger J Exp Clin Biosci [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 May 16 ];9:165-171
Available from:

Full Text


The use of mobile phones and wireless technology has gradually increased throughout the world with increasing concern about their potential biological effect on the ecosystem; this has also raised the need for scientific research into these effects. This situation became even more complicated with the rapid development of the new generation of wireless networks, designed for communication purposes, and specifically for mobile phones along with associated infrastructure.[1]

The effects of radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) radiation on biological systems are suggested to be via (a) thermal and (b) nonthermal mechanisms. The former could increase body temperature caused by mobile phone radiation, resulting in damage to tissues and cells. On the other hand, the nonthermal mechanism causes cell injury via oxidative stress (OS) due to free radical formation, which may lead to alterations in membrane structure and function.[2]

OS occurs if there is a disequilibrium between the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the capacity of the antioxidant system to neutralize them. This OS has been implicated in most health symptoms associated with RF-EMF, especially through the induction of biomarkers of OS and inflammation in the brain,[3] as demonstrated in both human and animal studies,[4],[5] though the intensity of RF-EMF radiation emitted by cell phones is much below the limiting specific absorption rate value of 0.08 W/kg for whole-body exposure[6],[7] to cause any thermal effect.

Of course, there are several gaps in the existing knowledge which do not permit one to reach a concrete conclusion on the possible harmful effects. This may be why exposure to these types of radiation is being considered an environmental pollutant, therefore posing an environmental risk that needs further investigations, as well as re-evaluation of established limits and standards.

 Materials and Methods

Animal care

The experimental rats were obtained at the Nigerian Institute of Medical Research (NIMR) Animal House, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria, following the NIMR Institutional Research Board for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and ethical approval (IRB/20/107) was obtained from the NIMR Institutional Review Board (IRB).

A total of 16 (8 females/8 males) healthy rats about 2 months old, weighing between 150 and 230 g, were randomly selected and divided equally into two groups: Group A (8 rats [4 males and 4 females housed in separate cages] exposed to mobile phone simulators) and Group C (8 rats [4 males and 4 females housed in separate cages] nonexposed as control). All the animals were maintained in clean plastic cages with wired tops to allow for ventilation food and water. Animals were acclimatized in an ambient environment at 25°C room temperature and to the pathogen-free laboratory conditions 3 days before experiments at 12:12-h day/night cycle. Food and water were provided ad libitum. Cages had wood shavings to protect them from their urine and stools; this was cleaned and changed every 2 days. Animals of all the groups are habituated to exposure cages for 1 week before the start of exposure to avoid procedure-related stress; body weight of animals was then taken at baseline and the end of the study period.

Exposure setup

After the short adaptation period, samples of the experimental groups were continuously exposed to a 3G (UTMS) mobile phone simulator with properties (frequency: 1800–2100 MHz, bandwidth – 2.0 GHz, transient burst – 10 mW/m2, variability – 0.667–3 mW/m2, and max field strength – 2 V/m), using that described in another study[8] as a guide, and built-in the Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Lagos, Nigeria. The antenna was 25 cm above the center of the rat cages. The exposure systems were placed in different rooms with similar conditions as the control; this procedure is similar to but slightly modified to a previous study.[9] There was no movement restriction for rats in the cages during the study period.

At the end of the 6 weeks, blood samples were drawn from the retro-ocular sinus of all the animals. The samples were collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid for hematological analysis while another portion was collected in a plain sample bottle, which was centrifuged, and serum decanted for biochemical analysis for OS biomarkers.

Hematological analysis

Whole blood was used to evaluate the effect of exposure on the level of hemoglobin (Hb), red blood cell (RBC), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular Hb concentration (MCHC), mean corpuscular Hb (MCH), white blood cells (WBCs), neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets. This was carried out using the Sysmex XS-1000i hematology analyzer at the Center for Human Virology and Genomics Laboratory, NIMR, Yaba, Lagos. Medical laboratory personnel were blinded to the group of the samples before analysis to guard against bias.

Biochemical analysis

For the biochemical study, the following antioxidant enzymes activities were used to evaluate the level of OS-superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH), catalase (CAT), malondialdehyde (MDA), GSH peroxidase, and GSH S-transferase (GST), which were determined spectrometrically. This was carried out by a biochemist who was blinded to the group of each sample before analysis at the Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, University of Lagos.

Determination of superoxide dismutase activity

SOD activity was determined by its ability to inhibit the auto-oxidation of epinephrine determined by the increase in absorbance at 480 nm. The Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) activity was determined by its ability to inhibit the auto-oxidation of epinephrine, determined by the increase in absorbance at 480nm, as described by Sun and Zigma (1978).[10]

Catalase activity determination

CAT activity was determined according to Sinha.[11] It was assayed calorimetrically at 620 nm and expressed as μmoles of H2O2 consumed/min/mg protein at 25°C. The reaction mixture (1.5 ml) contained 1.0 ml of 0.01M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 0.1 ml of tissue homogenate, and 0.4 ml of 2M H2O2. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 2.0 ml of dichromate-acetic acid reagent (5% potassium dichromate and glacial acetic acid were mixed in a 1:3 ratio). Σ =40M − 1 cm− 1.

Lipid peroxidation

MDA, an index of lipid peroxidation, was determined using the method of Buege and Aust.[12] 1.0 ml of the supernatant was added to 2 ml of (1:1:1 ratio) TCA-TBA-HCl reagent (thiobarbituric acid 0.37%, 0.24 N HCl, and 15% TCA) tricarboxylic acid-thiobarbituric acid-hydrochloric acid reagent boiled at 100°C for 15 min and allowed to cool. Flocculent materials were removed by centrifuging at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was removed, and the absorbance read at 532 nm against a blank

Reduced glutathione determination

The reduced GSH content of liver tissue as nonprotein sulfhydryl was estimated according to the method described by Sedlak and Lindsay.[13] To the homogenate, 10% TCA was added and centrifuged. 1.0 ml of supernatant was treated with 0.5 ml of Ellman's reagent (19.8 mg of 5,5-dithiobisnitrobenzoic acid in 100 ml of 0.1% sodium nitrate) and 3.0 ml of phosphate buffer (0.2M, pH 8.0). The absorbance was read at 412 nm.

Determination of glutathione-S-transferase activity

GST activity was determined by the method according to Habig et al.[14] This is since all known GST demonstrate a relatively high activity with 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) as the second substrate. Consequently, the conventional assay for GST activity utilizes CDNB as substrate. When this substrate is conjugated with reduced GSH, its absorption maximum shifts to a longer wavelength. The absorption increases at the new wavelength of 340 nm which provides a direct measurement of the enzymatic reaction.

Data analysis

Data were entered and analyzed with the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM, SPSS version 25.0) (IBM SPSS version 25 – Licensed material of IBM corporation and its licensors 1989, 2017 in Chicago, USA), Licensed Materials – Property of IBM Corporation and its Licensors 1989, 2017. Descriptive analysis of the baseline and final weight (FW) was done, while a bivariate analysis comparing the exposed and control groups was carried out using the independent t-test. Power density was measured in μW/m2.


The study used 16 albino rats randomly grouped into exposed and control, with each group consisting of four males and four females. The descriptive analysis is shown in [Table 1]. A closer look at the table also shows that the FW of control was higher than that of the baseline weight (BW) as expected, but this was the reverse for the exposed, as illustrated in [Figure 1]. This trend was replicated when compared across gender [Figure 2]. Further analysis with an independent t-test showed no statistical significance across gender [Table 2] or the groups [Table 3].{Table 1}{Figure 1}{Figure 2}{Table 2}{Table 3}

Analysis of hematological parameters showed a general increase in the mean level of these parameters in the exposed as compared to the control except for lymphocytes [Table 4]. Further analysis using an independent t-test showed that only granulocytes had statistical significance at P < 0.05. The analysis of biochemical OS markers showed that the mean level of these markers was reduced in the exposed when compared to that of the control, except for GST [Table 5]. Further analysis using an independent t-test showed that only SOD and CAT showed statistical significance across the two groups.{Table 4}{Table 5}


This experimental study used 16 albino rats randomly grouped into exposed and control, with each group consisting of four males and four females. The outcome of the study shows that exposure to RF-EMF affected the weight of the animals; this is illustrated when comparing the BW/FW of the exposed as compared to the control. This trend was also replicated when compared across gender, though further analysis showed no significance across the two groups. The hematological analysis result showed that only granulocytes (neutrophils, basophils, and eosinophils) showed significance, while for OS, the result showed that SOD and CAT showed significant differences across the two groups.

This study has shown that RF-EMF has some effects on the body weight of animals as illustrated by the difference between the BW and FW of both the control and the exposed though not significant. This is supported by a previous study,[15] while another study showed that there was a statistically significant weight difference between the exposed and the control, with significant weight loss in the exposed.[16],[17]

The outcome of the analysis of hematological parameters showed an increase in the mean level of all the blood parameters for the exposed as compared with the control except for lymphocytes, though only granulocytes (neutrophils, basophils, and eosinophils) showed statistical significance. This agrees with a previous study that indicated that long-term exposure of mice to RF-EMF would lead to an increased number of neutrophils. This increase in the level of neutrophils has been attributed to the compensation for the impairment of neutrophils caused by cell phone radiation.[9],[18] Various experimental studies have shown different outcomes on exposure to RF-EMF; for instance, a study which used Sprague Dawley rats exposed to 2450MHz of EMF for 1 year showed significant increases in RBC count, Hb content, and HCT value.[19] Similarly, authors like Bonhomme-Faivre et al. reported a decline in lymphocytes in mice depending on the duration of exposure to the magnetic field,[20] while another reported that chronic exposure to a 0.2–6.6-μT magnetic field can lead to decreased total lymphocytes in humans and mice.[21] Furthermore, previous studies reported that exposure of experimental animals to RF EMFs resulted in a significant increase in blood platelet count, which is confirmed by the proliferation of megakaryocytes, the precursor cells of blood platelets.[22-24] In contrast, another study showed that there were decreases in RBC count, Hb, and HCT, RBCs indices (MCV, MCH, and MCHC) upon exposure of rats to 900MHz for 2 months. The depletion in the values of hematological parameters following EMF radiation exposure may be attributed to OS due to overproduction of ROS by microwave radiation interaction,[22] while another study on rats showed no significant difference in total leukocyte, neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, eosinophil, and basophil counts, or in erythrocyte, HCT, MCH, MCHC, RDW, PLT, and PDW levels between the exposed and sham-exposed groups.[25] Some other studies showed an increase in RBC count and a decrease in WBC count and lymphocyte count after prolonged exposure to microwave radiation.[26] Exposure to RF-EMF has been shown to result in deterioration of RBC function and metabolic activity, and it was expected that the increase of toxicity in specific organs was a result of the RBC functional failure which has been attributed to OS.[19] Reasons for the difference in the outcome of the different studies may not be unconnected with the methodology used and the type of exposure, duration, and pattern of exposure. To support this, an overview concluded that exposure of human and experimental animals to EMFs may cause disturbance in hematological parameters depending on species, the sources of EMFs, frequencies, intensities, and duration of exposure, etc.[27]

Literature has also shown that increased RF-EMF exposure can modify the cellular balance by generating ROS and some antioxidant mechanisms such as SOD, CAT, and GSH GST protect tissues. SOD is the first step of defense mechanism against ROS and catalyzes the dismutation of the superoxide anion into hydrogen peroxide which is now converted into H2O and O2 by CAT.[28] The outcome of the analysis on serum OS in this study showed that the mean level of serum OS biomarkers was reduced in the exposed when compared with the control except for GST. Although only SOD and CAT showed statistical significance across the two groups. This is in concordance with a previous experimental study which showed a significant decrease in the activity of SOD, CAT, and GSH peroxidase in rats exposed to EMR compared to the control group.[29] Similarly, Sowa et al. found some associations between EMF exposure and OS biomarkers, though not consistent across the different biomarkers.[30] The decreased SOD activity may occur either via direct oxidative damage of the SOD or by the altered pattern of SOD gene expression by OS or both.[31]

In a study using Wistar albino rats, the result showed an increased level of MDA but a reduced level of GSH, SOD, and CAT between control and exposed for 2 weeks,[32] while another study, in which continuous RF-EMF was applied at 2.45 GHz for 20 weeks, showed no significant difference in lipid peroxidation, whereas a significant decrement was reported in the CAT and GSH-Px activities of rats' testes.[33] The differences in the OS biomarker in this study may be because RF-EMF effects are dependent on some physicals such as frequency, modulation, polarization, duration, the water content of tissues, and humidity and biological variables (species, size, weight, the geometry of the body, and nutritional and health status).[34]

Experimental studies have also associated the generation of ROS due to exposure to RF-EMF to induction of OS which may also lead to DNA fragmentation. This is shown in a study by Campisi et al.[35] which investigated acute effects of 900 MHz RF for different exposure periods (5, 10, or 20 min) on primary rat neocortical astroglial cell cultures and indicated the importance of the amplitude modulation and observed that only 20 min exposure of RF-EMF increased ROS and DNA fragmentation. Literature has shown that if this unfavorable state (OS) persists over a long period or occurs repeatedly, it can lead to changes in the biological material, as well as the genetic and epigenetic information, and can lead to health-related malfunctions, which have been observed in many diseases, such as diabetes and congenital malformations,[36] and they have a potential role in the initiation, promotion, and malignant conversion stages of carcinogenesis[37] and protein oxidation may play a significant role damaging biomolecules other than DNA in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinson's disease.[38]


The biological effect of exposure to RF-EMF will continue to generate controversies as well as concerns, as different studies have shown a different level of outcomes. This study has particularly shown its associated effect on OS biomarkers and blood parameters. Therefore, it is advised to limit the use of EMF emitting devices for household and occupational activities, where possible, while further studies are being carried out on their potential adverse effect. In addition, it is recommended that policymakers should push for the use of the precautionary principle in the use of this technology generally and encourage further research areas to enable understanding the exact mechanism and site of action upon continuous exposure to such radiations.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


1Saliev T, Begimbetova D, Masoud AR, Matkarimov B. Biological effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields: Two sides of a coin. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2019;141:25-36.
2Foster KR, Glaser R. Thermal mechanisms of interaction of radiofrequency energy with biological systems with relevance to exposure guidelines. Health Phys 2007;92:609-20.
3Dasdag S, Akdag MZ, Erdal ME, Erdal N, Ay OI, Ay ME, et al. Effects of 2.4 GHz radiofrequency radiation emitted from Wi-Fi equipment on microRNA expression in brain tissue. Int J Radiat Biol 2015;91:555-61.
4Fragopoulou AF, Miltiadous P, Stamatakis A, Stylianopoulou F, Koussoulakos SL, Margaritis LH. Whole body exposure with GSM 900MHz affects spatial memory in mice. Pathophysiology 2010;17:179-87.
5Otitoloju AA, Obe IA, Adewale OA, Otubanjo OA, Osunkalu VO. 'Preliminary study on the induction of sperm head abnormalities in mice, Mus musculus, exposed to radiofrequency radiations from global system for mobile communication base stations. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2010;84:51-4.
6ICNIRP STATEMENT. Principles for non-ionizing radiation protection. Health Phys 2020;118:477-82.
7ICNIRP GUIDELINES. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International commission on non-ionizing radiation protection. Health Phys 1998;74:494-522.
8Eghlidospour M, Ghanbari A, Mortazavi SM, Azari H. Effects of radiofrequency exposure emitted from a GSM mobile phone on proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of neural stem cells. Anat Cell Biol 2017;50:115-23.
9Yinhui P, Hui G, Lin L, Xin A, Qinyou T. Effect of cell phone radiation on neutrophil of mice. Int J Radiat Biol 2019;95:1178-84.
10Sun M, Zigman S. An improved spectrophotometric assay for superoxide dismutase based on epinephrine autoxidation. Anal Biochem 1978;90:81-9.
11Sinha AK. Colorimetric assay of catalase. Anal Biochem 1972;47:389-94.
12Buege JA, Aust SD. Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol 1978;52:302-10.
13Sedlak J, Lindsay RH. Estimation of total, protein-bound, and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellman's reagent. Anal Biochem 1968;25:192-205.
14Habig WH, Pabst MJ, Jakoby WB. Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J Biol Chem 1974;249:7130-9.
15González-Riola J, Pamies JA, Hernández ER, Revilla M, Seco C, Villa LF, et al. Influence of electromagnetic fields on bone mass and growth in developing rats: A morphometric, densitometric, and histomorphometric study. Calcif Tissue Int 1997;60:533-7.
16Abdel-Aziz I, EL-Khozonda HJ, Shabat M, Elwasife K, Osman AM. Effect of electromagnetic field on body weight and blood indices in albino rats and the therapeutic action of Vitamin C OR E. Rom J Biophys 2010;20:235-44.
17Wilson BW, Matt KS, Morris JE, Sasser LB, Miller DL, Anderson LE. Effects of 60 Hz magnetic field exposure on the pineal and hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in the Siberian hamster (Phodopus sungorus). Bioelectromagnetics 1999;20:224-32.
18El-Gohary OA, Said MA. Effect of electromagnetic waves from mobile phone on immune status of male rats: Possible protective role of Vitamin D. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2017;95:151-6.
19Esfahani MS, Radmehr B, Kohbodi A. Detection of probable effects of microwave exposure of blood parameters of RBC, PCV and Hb in rat. Pak J Biol Sci 2007;10:4567-9.
20Bonhomme-Faivre, L., Bizi, E., Marion, S., Bezie, Y., Rudant, E., Auclair, H., Orbach-Arbouys, S. Effects of sub chronic 50 Hz 5 mT magnetic field exposure on hematological parameters in mice. Electro and Magnetobiology 1995, 14:193–197.
21Jain N., Shedpure M., Tikariha R, Karanjgaonkar P.., Ratre M., and Agniwanshi S. Review article magnetic field effect on the biological system. Indian J Life Sci 2015; 5:135 51.
22Eid FA, El-Gendy AM, Zahkouk SA, et al. Ameliorative effect of two antioxidants on the liver of male albino rats exposed to an electromagnetic field. Egypt J Hosp Med 2015;58:74-93.
23Hashem MA, El-Sharkawy NI. The effects of low electromagnetic field and lead acetate combination on some hemato-biochemical and immunotoxicological parameters in mice. Turk J Haematol 2009;26:181-9.
24Zaghloul MS. Effects of chronic exposure to the static electromagnetic field on certain histological aspects of the spleen and some haematological parameters in albino rats. J Amer Sci 2011;7:383-94.
25Cakir DU, Yokus B, Akdag MZ, Sert C, Mete N. Alterations of hematological variations in rats exposed to extremely low frequency magnetic fields (50 Hz). Arch Med Res 2009;40:352-6.
26Kumari P, Manjula SD, Gautham K. In vitro study of the effect of radiation emitted by mobile phone on osmotic fragility and other blood parameters. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci 2016;7:1283-92.
27Jbireal JM, Azab AE, Elsayed AS. Disturbance in haematological parameters induced by exposure to electromagnetic fields. Hematol Transfus Int J 2016;6:242-51.
28Sarban S, Kocyigit A, Yazar M, Isikan UE. Plasma total antioxidant capacity, lipid peroxidation, and erythrocyte antioxidant enzyme activities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Clin Biochem 2005;38:981-6.
29Kamali K, Taravati A, Sayyadi S, Gharib FZ, Maftoon H. Evidence of oxidative stress after continuous exposure to Wi-Fi radiation in rat model. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2018;25:35396-403.
30Sowa, P., Sieron-Stoltny, K., Cieslar, G. and Sieron, A. Impact of Electromagnetic Field Generated by Mobile Phone on Prooxidant-antioxidant Balance in Selected Internal Organs of Rats. Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium Proceedings, Stockholm, Sweden 2013, 12-15: 1903.
31Klaunig JE, Kamendulis LM, Hocevar BA. Oxidative stress and oxidative damage in carcinogenesis. Toxicol Pathol 2010;38:96-109.
32Awad SM, Hassan NS. Health risks of electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone on the brain of rats. J Appl Sci Res 2008;4:1994-2000.
33Atasoy HI, Gunal MY, Atasoy P, Elgun S, Bugdayci G. Immunohistopathologic demonstration of deleterious effects on growing rat testes of radiofrequency waves emitted from conventional Wi-Fi devices. J Pediatr Urol 2013;9:223-9.
34Singh S, Kapoor N, “Health Implications of Electromagnetic Fields, Mechanisms of Action, and Research Needs”, Advances in Biology, 2014. Article ID 198609, 2014;1-25.
35Campisi A, Gulino M, Acquaviva R, Bellia P, Raciti G, Grasso R, et al. Reactive oxygen species levels and DNA fragmentation on astrocytes in primary culture after acute exposure to low-intensity microwave electromagnetic field. Neurosci Lett 2010;473:52-5.
36Brieger K, Schiavone S, Miller FJ Jr., Krause KH. Reactive oxygen species: From health to disease. Swiss Med Wkly 2012;142:w13659.
37Disdaroglu M, Jaruga P, Birincioglu M, Rodriguez H. Free radical-induced damage to DNA: Mechanism and measurement. Free Radic Biol Med 2002;32:1102-15.
38Manoharan S, Guillemin GJ, Abiramasundari RS, Essa MM, Akbar M, Akbar MD. “The Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, and Huntington's Disease: A Mini Review”, Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 2016, Article ID 8590578, 2016;1-16.